Mental Health Law & Ethics — Civil Commitment, Insanity Defense, and Patients’ Rights Explained | Chapter 14 of Essentials of Abnormal Psychology

The intersection of psychology and the legal system raises critical questions about individual rights, public safety, and professional responsibility. Chapter 14 of Essentials of Abnormal Psychology examines civil and criminal commitment procedures, the insanity defense, patients’ rights, and ethical standards governing research and practice. This guide will help you grasp these complex issues and prepare for exam questions on mental health law and ethics.

Watch the Chapter Summary

Prefer an audio-visual overview? Watch the full summary below and subscribe to Last Minute Lecture for more chapter guides.

Civil Commitment: Balancing Care and Freedom

Civil commitment allows involuntary hospitalization of individuals who pose a danger to themselves or others, or who cannot care for their basic needs. Key criteria include:

• Danger to Self or Others: Suicidal intent or violent behaviors.
• Grave Disability: Inability to provide for food, shelter, or safety.
• Severe Impairment: Lack of capacity to make rational treatment decisions.

The process involves psychological evaluation, court hearings, and legal representation to protect individual rights while ensuring safety.

Criminal Commitment & the Insanity Defense

When mental illness intersects with criminal law, two key procedures emerge:

• Competence to Stand Trial: Defendants must understand proceedings and assist in their defense.
• Insanity Defense (NGRI): A defendant who cannot distinguish right from wrong due to a mental disorder may be found not guilty by reason of insanity.

Criminal commitment follows an NGRI verdict or a finding of incompetence, placing individuals in secure treatment settings rather than prisons.

Patients’ Rights and Ethical Treatment

Ethical and legal standards safeguard the autonomy and dignity of mental health patients:

• Right to Treatment: Access to appropriate care in the least restrictive environment.
• Right to Refuse Treatment: Patients may decline medications or therapy unless deemed incompetent.
• Deinstitutionalization: Shift from asylums to community care, though resource shortages can lead to transinstitutionalization (nursing homes, prisons).

Ethical Issues in Research & Practice

Mental health professionals must adhere to rigorous ethical guidelines:

• Informed Consent: Participants and patients must understand risks and benefits before agreeing to treatment or research.
• Duty to Warn (Tarasoff Rule): Clinicians must breach confidentiality if a client poses a serious threat to an identifiable person.
• Scientist–Practitioner Model: Integrating empirical research (clinical efficacy) with real-world application (clinical utility).

Conclusion: Upholding Ethics & Justice

Chapter 14 highlights the delicate balance between protecting society and preserving individual liberties. By understanding civil and criminal commitment laws, patients’ rights, and ethical research standards, you’ll be prepared to discuss how psychology informs mental health policy and practice.

For detailed case studies and definitions, watch the full Chapter 14 video summary on Last Minute Lecture. Strengthen your grasp of forensic and ethical issues with these frameworks.

If you found this breakdown helpful, be sure to subscribe to Last Minute Lecture for more chapter-by-chapter textbook summaries and academic study guides.