Within-Subjects Design — Repeated Measures, Counterbalancing, and Order Effects | Chapter 9 of Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences
Within-Subjects Design — Repeated Measures, Counterbalancing, and Order Effects | Chapter 9 of Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences
Chapter 9 of Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences introduces the within-subjects design, also known as the repeated-measures design. In this approach, the same group of participants experiences every treatment condition. By eliminating the variability caused by individual differences, this design increases statistical power and makes it easier to detect true treatment effects. However, within-subjects designs also bring unique challenges, particularly with time-related and order-related threats to validity.
Watch the complete breakdown above and subscribe to Last Minute Lecture for more chapter-by-chapter summaries.

Advantages of Within-Subjects Designs
This design structure offers several strengths:
- Eliminates individual differences: Each participant serves as their own control, removing variance across groups.
- Increased statistical power: More sensitive to detecting treatment effects with smaller sample sizes.
- Efficiency: Requires fewer participants compared to between-subjects designs.
Threats to Internal Validity
Despite its strengths, the within-subjects approach introduces specific risks:
- History: Events outside the study may influence participants’ responses over time.
- Maturation: Natural changes in participants, such as fatigue or learning, may affect outcomes.
- Statistical regression: Extreme scores naturally move closer to the mean on retesting.
- Instrumentation: Changes in measurement tools or observers can distort results.
- Order effects: Progressive changes like practice, fatigue, or carry-over effects can confound results.
Order Effects and Counterbalancing
Order effects are one of the most significant challenges in within-subjects research. To address them, researchers use:
- Complete counterbalancing: All possible treatment orders are used across participants.
- Partial counterbalancing: A subset of possible orders is used to minimize order bias.
- Latin square design: Each treatment appears in every position across participants, balancing order effects systematically.
Matched-Subjects Design
The matched-subjects design serves as a hybrid between within- and between-subjects designs. In this approach, participants are paired or grouped based on relevant characteristics, and each member of the pair is assigned to a different condition. This balances individual differences while avoiding some order effects.
Statistical Applications
Within-subjects designs require specialized statistical methods that account for repeated measures:
- Repeated-measures t-test: Compares two treatment conditions within the same group.
- Repeated-measures ANOVA: Analyzes differences across more than two conditions.
- Nonparametric tests: Such as the sign test and Wilcoxon signed-ranks test, used when data do not meet parametric assumptions.
Conclusion
Chapter 9 highlights the power of within-subjects designs to increase sensitivity and efficiency in research by controlling for individual differences. At the same time, researchers must carefully address threats like order effects, history, and maturation. Counterbalancing and matched-subjects designs offer solutions to strengthen validity. With proper design and statistical analysis, within-subjects experiments provide a robust method for uncovering treatment effects in behavioral science.
For more insights, watch the full chapter summary above and explore the entire textbook playlist here: Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences Playlist.
If you found this summary useful, don’t forget to subscribe to Last Minute Lecture for more psychology study resources and textbook breakdowns.
Comments
Post a Comment