Ethics in Research — Human and Animal Protections, APA Code, and Scientific Integrity | Chapter 4 of Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences
Ethics in Research — Human and Animal Protections, APA Code, and Scientific Integrity | Chapter 4 of Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences
Chapter 4 of Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences examines the ethical foundations that ensure research in psychology and the behavioral sciences is conducted responsibly. From protecting human participants to maintaining scientific integrity, this chapter emphasizes why ethical principles are central to trustworthy research.
Watch the complete summary above and subscribe to Last Minute Lecture for more clear and reliable study guides.

Historical Foundations of Research Ethics
The chapter begins with historical case studies that shaped modern ethical standards:
- Nuremberg Code: Established after World War II, emphasizing voluntary consent and participant welfare.
- Tuskegee Syphilis Study: A 40-year study in which treatment was withheld from African American men, highlighting the dangers of exploitation and lack of informed consent.
- Milgram’s Obedience Experiments: Famous for exposing participants to psychological stress, sparking debate on the limits of deception and harm in research.
The Belmont Report Principles
Modern ethics are built on the three principles outlined in the Belmont Report:
- Respect for persons: Recognizing autonomy and requiring informed consent.
- Beneficence: Maximizing benefits while minimizing harm.
- Justice: Ensuring fairness in participant selection and treatment.
The APA Ethics Code
The APA Ethics Code expands on these principles, outlining standards for researchers, including:
- No harm: Protecting participants from physical and psychological risks.
- Informed consent: Explaining procedures, risks, and rights to participants.
- Confidentiality and anonymity: Safeguarding participant data.
- Deception and debriefing: Allowing limited deception only when necessary and ensuring full debriefing afterward.
Institutional Oversight
Research involving human and animal participants requires institutional review:
- Institutional Review Board (IRB): Reviews human research proposals for ethical compliance, ensuring protection of rights and welfare.
- Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC): Evaluates animal research protocols, requiring humane treatment and justification for use of animals.
Ethics in Animal Research
Federal guidelines mandate ethical treatment of nonhuman subjects, requiring that researchers minimize pain, use alternatives where possible, and ensure proper housing and care. The IACUC enforces these standards at the institutional level.
Scientific Integrity
Beyond participant protection, ethics extend to maintaining honesty in research. The chapter warns against:
- Fraud: Intentionally fabricating or misrepresenting data.
- Plagiarism: Presenting others’ ideas or words without credit.
Safeguards like replication, peer review, and open data sharing help maintain accountability and transparency in science.
Conclusion
Chapter 4 underscores that ethical practices are not optional but essential to valid, credible research. By understanding historical abuses, applying principles like respect, beneficence, and justice, and adhering to the APA Ethics Code, researchers ensure that behavioral science advances responsibly. Institutional oversight and scientific integrity provide the foundation for protecting participants, promoting fairness, and sustaining public trust in psychology.
For more insights, watch the full video summary above and explore the complete playlist of chapter guides: Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences Playlist.
If you found this breakdown useful, be sure to subscribe to Last Minute Lecture for more textbook summaries and research study guides.
Comments
Post a Comment