Statistical Evaluation of Data — Descriptive and Inferential Statistics in Psychology | Chapter 15 of Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences

Chapter 15 of Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences provides an essential overview of the statistical methods used to evaluate data in psychological research. Statistics transform raw data into meaningful insights, helping researchers summarize distributions, test hypotheses, and interpret results with both precision and context. This chapter distinguishes between descriptive and inferential statistics, introduces common statistical tests, and emphasizes the importance of effect size and confidence intervals in understanding research outcomes.

Watch the complete breakdown above and subscribe to Last Minute Lecture for more psychology study guides and research summaries.

Descriptive vs. Inferential Statistics

Descriptive statistics summarize data from a sample, while parameters describe population values. Key measures include:

• Central tendency: Mean, median, and mode capture the “typical” score.
• Variability: Variance and standard deviation indicate how spread out scores are.
• Visual tools: Frequency distributions, histograms, bar graphs, and scatter plots display patterns in data.

Inferential statistics allow researchers to generalize from sample data to larger populations. These methods account for sampling error and estimate the likelihood that results reflect real effects rather than chance.

Hypothesis Testing

The logic of hypothesis testing involves comparing observed data to what would be expected if the null hypothesis were true. Key components include:

• Alpha level (α): The threshold for rejecting the null hypothesis, often set at .05.
• p-value: The probability of obtaining the observed results if the null hypothesis is true.
• Type I error: Incorrectly rejecting a true null hypothesis (false positive).
• Type II error: Failing to reject a false null hypothesis (false negative).

Statistical Tests

Depending on the research design and measurement scales, researchers select from a variety of tests:

• t-tests: Compare means between two groups (independent or repeated measures).
• ANOVA: Compares means across multiple groups or conditions.
• Chi-square tests: Evaluate relationships between categorical variables.
• Pearson and Spearman correlations: Assess strength and direction of relationships between variables.
• Regression analysis: Predicts outcomes using one or more predictor variables (linear, multiple regression).

Effect Size and Confidence Intervals

Statistical significance alone does not indicate the importance of a result. Effect size measures provide information about the magnitude of effects:

• Cohen’s d: Standardized mean difference.
• r² and η²: Proportion of variance explained by an independent variable.

Confidence intervals provide a range of plausible values for population parameters, adding precision to statistical conclusions.

Applications of Correlation and Regression

Correlations help determine reliability, validity, and predictive utility of tests. Regression extends this by allowing multiple predictors, controlling for confounds, and producing more accurate forecasts of behavior.

Conclusion

Chapter 15 underscores the central role of statistics in behavioral science. Descriptive tools summarize data clearly, inferential methods test hypotheses, and effect sizes ensure results are interpreted with practical meaning. By selecting the appropriate tests and reporting results transparently, researchers strengthen the validity and impact of their findings.

For more detail, watch the complete video summary above and review the full chapter series here: Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences Playlist.

If you found this breakdown useful, don’t forget to subscribe to Last Minute Lecture for more psychology research summaries and textbook study guides.